Planners join county opposition to proposed water regulations

By Karen Brainard

San Diego County is asking local advisory groups to support its efforts to oppose proposed stormwater regulations that it says will impact development and will be extremely costly.

A public workshop on the proposal will be held on Tuesday, Nov. 13, at 9 a.m. in the City of San Diego Public Utilities Department Wastewater Branch Auditorium, 9192 Topaz Way in San Diego.

Stephanie Gaines, land use and environmental planner for the county’s Department of Public Works, gave a presentation to the Ramona Community Planning Group at its November meeting, on the draft municipal stormwater permit update issued by the San Diego region of the California Regional Quality Control Board (RWQCB). She explained that the regulations stem from the federal Environmental Protection Agency’s Clean Water Act and are passed down to the state, regional, and local levels.

Gaines reviewed the proposed National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program that controls water pollution.

“This new permit is a complete departure from the permit we’re under, said Gaines. “It adds a lot of new regulations and requirements. To a lot of them, we don’t see any benefit to water quality.”

Gaines said one of the biggest concerns is a “far-reaching” goal for bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL), the maximum amount of a pollutant that a body of water can receive and still meet requirments. The county estimates that it will spend $2.2 to $4.2 billion over a 20-year period to implement that requirement with no assurance the target can be attained.

Other county concerns are additional requirements for development projects and regulated agencies’ exposure to third-party lawsuits.

In September, county supervisors issued a call to action to protect water quality but to control mounting and unreasonable costs of increased regulations on local governments, business and industry, according to Gaines’ presentation.

Planning group member Chad Anderson said the regulations could become cost prohibitive for builders of private homes or commercial developments. He said the regulations’ language appears to overlap with statements from Agenda 21, the comprehensive global plan for sustainable development that was created at a United Nation’s Earth Summit in 1992. It was signed by more than 178 countries, including the United States, and opponents say it targets private property.

The planning group agreed to send a letter to county Supervisor Dianne Jacob to support her efforts and state that the RWQCB proposed requirements are unreasonable.

More information on the regional water board’s proposal is available at

Public comments must be sent by Jan. 11, 2013, to San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, 9174 Sky Park Court, Suite 100, San Diego, CA. 92123-4340.

According to the county, the new regulations are targeted to be implemented in spring 2013.

Related posts:

  1. County considers tiered equine regulations
  2. Proposed solar farm poses dilemma for planners
  3. Planners criticize proposed guidelines for single-family homes
  4. Water district may join fight over proposed solar fee
  5. Planners mixed about county’s residential guidelines

Short URL:

Posted by Maureen Robertson on Nov 8 2012. Filed under Government, News, Ramona. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry

6 Comments for “Planners join county opposition to proposed water regulations”

  1. Uh huh

    No more new homes or commercial development, that would be a good thing for this town until someone figures out a solution to the traffic problem!!!

    • Halthzor

      To Uh huh: I think you missed the point totally. You need to re-read the article again. This is going to totally destroy our current tax system, and cost all of us a ton of money. Probably without any real improvements in the environment.

  2. Guest

    And the new regulations that will be placed on all water agencies is horrendous and we will all get to pay for it via higher rates, etc. People need to realize that when you vote for certain things under the Clean Water Act there are underlying regulations you don't hear or read about when approving such measures. This is one of those consequences.

  3. Tim

    Where is the water for these new developments supposed to come? Are they based upon the theft of others water such as from the Colorado River, the Owens River, the Sacramento. Others water should be left alone and San Diego should recognize we have limitiations on expansion. Unless these new developments fully fund themselves and their water supplies with desalination plants there is no room for them in San Diego.

  4. Livia

    Nice one-sided story. Nothing about the actual regulations themselves, or the current regulations. If everyone is okay with waiting 72 hours to enter the water every time it rains, dealing with polluted waters and contaminated fish, then by all means, let's stop regulating storm water.

    • Halthzor

      Nice one sided reply to an article. You should also ask how much you are willing to pay for the privilege of clean water in the ocean and other bodies of water. And put it in context with the fact that it may not actually work to clean up the water. Also, put it alongside the continuing rise in all taxes and fees. So again, how much are you willing to pay out of your ever dwindling resources to pay for something that may not actually work, anyway.

Leave a Reply