Comments on: Draft plan includes four Ramona roads

By: dls

dls — Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:20:20 +0000

The Pamo Road Bridge is a bridge to nowhere. A bridge already exists. Pamo Road is a dead-end unless the feds open the rough Santa Ysabel truck trail, which they close and open to keep busy. There are very few people living in Pamo valley after SDGE burned out the majority of houses in 2007. Pamo valley is a planned reservoir, so why invest in a bridge that equates to about $1 million per resident when someday the valley and bridge will be underwater? This money should be used elsewhere or not taken from the private sector.

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 03 Aug 2012 03:23:16 +0000

I never thought about the trees until your comment. When I first moved here a couple of years ago, my friends called it the "Lord of the Rings" drive fondly. But apart from that, I am most disapointed that we are going to be stuck with the traffic/construction delays and in the end, the road will not have gained anymore capacity. What a waste! Have the fires not taught us that the road needs 2 lanes in each direction? At a minimum we need 2 lanes from the SDCE area to Warnock as an evacuation resource. No one is biking out during a fire but there will be plenty of big trucks and horse trailers at a whoping 25mph when the rest of us want to go 60mph.

By: Susan Martin

Susan Martin — Thu, 02 Aug 2012 22:23:16 +0000

I have to agree with you, it is the best part of the drive into the estates. Will be sad if they take the trees. Not what I call progress…

By: Mrs. D

Mrs. D — Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:12:57 +0000

Honestly, I live off of San Vicente and Wildcat canyon road, I would rather they just decrease the speed limit and make a pedestrian/bike path from Wildcat to warnock, if anything at all. I would hate for them to cut down all of the trees on San Vicente, it totally makes the drive, I will be very dissapointed if they go.